According to CCI studies, when people and computers work together for teams to solve problems, what is the result in terms of innovation?

The relationship between people and computers in collaborative settings, according to CCI (Collaborative Computing Initiative) studies, is understood to enhance innovation rather than hinder it. When individuals work alongside computers for problem-solving, they can leverage the strengths of both human creativity and computational processing power. This combination tends to lead to more innovative outcomes compared to solitary efforts.

In team collaborations, humans can utilize advanced tools to analyze data, generate ideas, and prototype solutions at a faster pace. This dynamic creates an environment ripe for creativity and innovation, as the fusion of human ingenuity and computational efficiency provides broader perspectives and capabilities. Therefore, the assertion that they are "more innovative than working alone" aligns with research findings indicating that collaboration actually stimulates more creative and effective problem-solving processes.

The idea that teams are less innovative or experience no change in innovation contradicts these established studies. Claims of dependency on technology are also misleading, as the best collaborations integrate human insight with technological capabilities, enhancing overall innovation rather than creating reliance.